2009/5/24 Eric Firing <efir...@hawaii.edu>:
>> OK, that would work. Although I think a named argument might be a more
>> transparent way to specify behaviour than setting the warnings.
>
> I agree; using a warning strikes me as an abuse of the warnings
> mechanism. Instead of a "strict" flag, which I find not particularly
> expressive--what is it being "strict" about?--how about a "min_count"
> kwarg to go with the existing "count" kwarg?
Warnings are a great way of telling the user that a non-fatal problem
cropped up. It isn't easy to send information along with an
exception, so I don't think raising an error here is ever particularly
useful.
Maybe we should provide tools in NumPy to handle warnings more easily?
Something like
with no_warnings:
np.fromfile('x')
or
with raise_warnings:
np.fromfile('x')
?
Regards
Stéfan
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
