Robert Kern wrote: > Yes. That's why I wrote the NPY format instead. I *did* do some due > diligence before I designed a new binary format.
I assumed so, and I also assume you took a look at netcdf3, but since it's been brought up here, I take it it dint fit the bill? Even if it did, while it will be around for a LONG time, it is an out-of-date format. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
