Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:03:47 +0100, Citi, Luca kirjoitti: [clip] > Excuse me if I insist, PyArray_Conjugate is not the problem. If when > using the numpy API, it is accepted something like: > > obj1 = PyArray_CreateSomehowAnArray(....); > obj2 = PyArray_DoSomethingWithArray(obj1,...); > obj3 = PyArray_DoSomethingElseWithArray(obj1,...); > Py_DECREF(obj1); > > then there is no way my patch is guaranteed to not break things.
So it seems. PyUFunc_GenericFunction is a part of the public C-API, so I guess this discussion is moot. I doubt we can change ufunc semantics at this point, and I don't see ways in which one could distinguish between "temporary arrays" and refcount-1 arrays used in extension modules. -- Pauli Virtanen _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
