On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Charles R Harris<charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Scott Sinclair > <scott.sinclair...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >2009/8/12 Keith Goodman <kwgood...@gmail.com>: >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Keith Goodman<kwgood...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Lars >> >> Bittrich<lars.bittr...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> a colleague made me aware of a speed issue with numpy.identity. Since >> >>> he was >> >>> using numpy.diag(numpy.ones(N)) before, he expected identity to be at >> >>> least as >> >>> fast as diag. But that is not the case. >> >>> >> >>> We found that there was a discussion on the list (July, 20th; "My >> >>> identity" by >> >>> Keith Goodman). The presented solution was much faster. Someone >> >>> wondered if >> >>> the change was already made in the svn. >> >> >> >> Things tend to get lost on the mailing list. The next step would be to >> >> file a ticket on the numpy trac. (I've never done that) That would >> >> increase the chance of someone important taking a look at it. >> > >> > Here's the ticket: >> > >> > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1193 >> > >> >> A patch against recent SVN trunk is attached to the ticket. Please >> review... > > Already done. Thanks.
Hey, thanks. Now I know how to do the first two steps: (1) Extend the work of others (in this case Luca Citi and Robert Kern) (2) File a ticket (3) ??? (4) Profit _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion