On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:33, Sebastian Haase <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I'm not subscribed to the cython list - hoping enough people would > care to justify my post here: > > I know that cython's numpy is still getting better and better over > time, but is it already today possible to have numpy support when > using Cython in "pure python" mode? > I like the idea of being able to develop and debug code "the python > way" -- and then just switching on the cython-overdrive mode. > (Otherwise I have very good experience using C/C++ with appropriate > typemaps, and I don't mind the C syntax) > > I only recently learned about the "pure python" mode on the sympy list > (and at the EuroScipy2009 workshop). > My understanding is that Cython's pure Python mode could be "played" > in two ways: > a) either not having a .pyx-file at all and putting everything into a > py-file (using the "import cython" stuff) > or b) putting only cython specific declaration in to a pyx file having > the same basename as the py-file next to it.
I'm pretty sure that you need Cython syntax that is not supported by the pure-Python mode in order to use numpy arrays effectively. > One more: there is no way on reload cython-modules (yet), right ? Correct. There is no way to reload any extension module. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
