On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 14:18, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > As a side note, should the cheby* versions of `polyval`, `polymul` etc. > just be dropped to reduce namespace clutter? You can do the same things > already within just class methods and arithmetic.
Just to clarify, you mean having classmethods that work on plain arrays of Chebyshev coefficients? I'm +1 on that. I'm -1 on only having a ChebyPoly class with instance methods, although it would be useful to have as an adjunct to the plain routines. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
