Charles R Harris wrote: > Sort of, it's actually (Xi.T*S).T, now that I think of it... I'll see if > that is any faster. And if there is a neater way of doing it I'd love to > hear about it. > > Xi*S[:,newaxis]
Thanks! (Obviously doesn't matter much in terms of performance, as it's only the initialization, but it definitely does make for nicer code.) _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
