On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "...this should be purely technical IMO. There are well established rules > here:" > > Simple, eh. The version should be 2.0. It would be simple if it were not for the obligation of getting it soon, in a matter of weeks. This means fixing any fundamental issue (e.g. to get a more maintainable ABI) is totally out of reach, and that we will have to maintain several branches at the same time, which I think everybody agree we lack the manpower for. David _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
