On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Darren Dale <dsdal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Darren Dale <dsdal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Charles R Harris > >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, David Cournapeau > >> > <da...@silveregg.co.jp> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Charles R Harris wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM, David Cournapeau > >> >> > <da...@silveregg.co.jp > >> >> > <mailto:da...@silveregg.co.jp>> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > josef.p...@gmail.com <mailto:josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > scipy is relatively easy to compile, I was thinking also of > >> >> > h5py, > >> >> > > pytables and pymc (b/c of pytables), none of them are > >> >> > importing > >> >> > with > >> >> > > numpy 1.4.0 because of the cython issue. > >> >> > > >> >> > As I said, all of them will have to be regenerated with cython > >> >> > 0.12.1. > >> >> > There is no other solution, > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Wait, won't the structures be the same size? If they are then the > >> >> > cython > >> >> > check won't fail. > >> >> > >> >> Yes, but the structures are bigger (even after removing the datetime > >> >> stuff, I had the cython warning when I did some tests). > >> >> > >> > > >> > That's curious. It sounds like it isn't ABI compatible yet. Any idea > of > >> > what > >> > was added? It would be helpful if the cython message gave a bit more > >> > information... > >> > >> Could it be related to __array_prepare__? > > > > Didn't __array_prepare__ go into 1.3? Did you add anything to a > structure? > > No, it was included in 1.4: > http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/doc/release/1.4.0-notes.rst > > No, I don't think so. I added __array_prepare__ to array_methods[] in this > file: > http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/numpy/core/src/multiarray/methods.c > > I don't see any struct definitions there, it looks clean. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion