On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:46 PM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I was wondering about that. Why do we have a private include directory? > > Would it make more sense to move it to core/include/numpy/private. > > No, the whole point is to avoid other packages to include that by > mistake, to avoid namespace pollution. > Isn't that what the npy prefix is for? In any case, if it needs to be at a higher level for easy inclusion, then it should move up. Or else all the c code should move down. Having a mix of obj_ptr->ob_type and Py_TYPE(obj_ptr) is just asking for trouble. Mindless consistency is the safest policy in such things. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
