On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris > >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris > >> >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > Hi All, > >> >> > > >> >> > David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy > >> >> > math > >> >> > library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how > we > >> >> > should > >> >> > organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in > >> >> > numpy/core/src? > >> >> > >> >> David already did this: numpy/core/src/npymath/ > >> >> > >> > > >> > Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to > >> > toss a > >> > lot of real numerical code into it. > >> > >> Who cares? I don't. > > > > I care. I want the code to be organized. > > Then do it when there is code and we can see what needs to be organized. > > I am writing code and I want to decide up front where to put it. I know where you stand, so you need say no more. I'm waiting to see if other folks have an opinion. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion