On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:45, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > la, 2010-04-10 kello 12:23 -0500, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti: > [clip] >> Here are my suggested additions to NumPy: >> ufunc methods: > [clip] >> * reducein (array, indices, axis=0) >> similar to reduce-at, but the indices provide both the >> start and end points (rather than being fence-posts like reduceat). > > Is the `reducein` important to have, as compared to `reduceat`?
Yes, I think so. If there are some areas you want to ignore, that's difficult to do with reduceat(). -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
