On Apr 18, 2010 6:46 PM, "Dan Roberts" <ademan...@gmail.com> wrote:
I've been trying my best to take my time formulating my replies but I need to respond eventually. :-) This is embarassing, but I'm actually not sure where I talked about an interface specifically. I did rather nebulously talk about interfacing with C code and LAPACK and the interfaces there would be provided by the respective code and consumed by micronumpy, at least as I currently see it. I haven't consulted maciej about this yet, but I think working backwards from a complete C NumPy depends on a great deal of "ifs", many of which I think aren't satisfied. I need to look into this, but I assume NumPy operates on array structures directly, rather than through an interface. If it's through an interface, there's a real possibility that approach is possible, though it would require me to write some adaptors, I think it would be ok, and a low enough time investment. Like I said I'm currently speaking from ignorance so I need to look into it and get back to you. Cheers, Dan P.S. I agree about the sparse matrices, I've bugged fijal a small bit about that. P.P.S. Forgot to CC the mailing list... assumed this mail client would do it for me.. lol > > On Apr 17, 2010 12:25 AM, "Stéfan van der Walt" <ste...@sun.ac.za> wrote: > > Hi Dan > > > On 17 April 2010 06:50, Dan Roberts <ademan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everybody, my name is Dan... > > Thanks for the introduction, and welcome to NumPy! > > > > I hadn't prepared for review by the NumPy mentors, but this can make my > proposal stronger t... > > This proposal builds a bridge between two projects, so even if it > technically falls under the... > > > > Why should we bother reimplimenting anything? PyPy, for those who are > unfamiliar, has the ... > > Your code has a fairly specialised application and it's worth > discussing exactly where it wou...
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion