On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jarrod Millman <mill...@berkeley.edu>wrote: > >> 2010/5/25 Stéfan van der Walt <ste...@sun.ac.za>: >> > Awesome! Since github now supports SVN interaction, and all the core >> > devs use Git, now might be a good time to move the entire numpy source >> > tree? It will certainly make it easier to merge the refactor changes! >> >> I would love to move numpy to github as well. Almost everything I >> work on is there now and I am really enjoying using git and the github >> infrastructure is really nice. This is obviously a separate issue and >> one that shouldn't deflect the discussion on the proposed refactoring. >> But given how many of the developers are using git-svn and that you >> can use an svn client with github, it might be worth having a quick >> discussion about this in the near future. For instance, I wonder how >> many of the developer's prefer using git at this point. Also it would >> be interesting to hear from any of the developer's who would be >> opposed to git. A few year's ago this was a hot topic for discussion, >> but it may be that this isn't very controversial at this point. >> >> > I think the main problem has been windows compatibility. Git is best from > the command line whereas the windows command line is an afterthought. > Another box that needs a check-mark is the buildbot. If svn clients are > supported then it may be that neither of those are going to be a problem. > However, It needs user testing. > > A newish git windows client I hadn't heard of before is gitextensions<http://code.google.com/p/gitextensions/> . Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
