>> But wouldn't the performance hit only come when I use it in this way? >> __getattr__ is only called if the named attribute is *not* found (I >> guess it falls off the end of the case statement, or is the result of >> the attribute hash table "miss"). > That's why I said that __getattr__ would perhaps work better.
So do you want me to try out an implementation and supply a patch? If so, where should I send the patch? Ian
<<attachment: ijstokes.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
