Thanks for your reply Ralf. I'm not sure if it's a warning or error, output looks like:
... building library "npymath" sources customize GnuFCompiler Found executable /usr/bin/g77 gnu: no Fortran 90 compiler found gnu: no Fortran 90 compiler found customize GnuFCompiler gnu: no Fortran 90 compiler found gnu: no Fortran 90 compiler found customize GnuFCompiler using config ... Not sure about the best way to move g77 off the path since it shares the same directory as gfortran and would require sysadmin intervention. Is there no way through site.cfg or some other means to force the setup.py to ignore g77? --john On Mar 7, 2011, at 12:56 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:18 AM, John Cartwright > <john.c.cartwri...@comcast.net> wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I'm trying to compile 1.5.1 on a RHEL5 system and I'm specifying: >> >> python setup.py config_fc --fcompiler=gnu95 build >> >> when doing the build. I see the message "Found executable /usr/bin/gfortran" >> - so far so good. However when I go to install using: >> >> python setup.py install >> >> I see the warnings "gnu: no Fortran 90 compiler found". How can I avoid >> this? install doesn't recognize the fcompiler option. > > Are you actually getting an error or just a warning? Are you trying to > install numpy or scipy (Fortran is not needed for scipy)? If no error, > what do you get when running ">>> numpy.test()" ? >> >> It appears that both f77 and gfortran are installed although the gfortran >> appears to have been used to compile liblapack.so (libgfortran.so.1 is >> listed as a dependency). > > You can move g77 off your PATH, then there's no chance of mixing up compilers. > > Ralf > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
