On 03/16/2011 10:14 PM, william ratcliff wrote: > Related to this, what is the status of fwrap? Can it be used with > fortran 95/2003 language features? There is a rather large code > crystallographic codebase (fullprof) that is written in fortran 77 > that the author has been porting to fortran 95/2003 and actually using > modules for. I'd like to write python bindings for it to make it more > scriptable...
Fwrap 0.1.1 is out; it supports a subset of Fortran 95/2003, biggest limitation being modules not being present. Since then there's been quite a few unreleased improvements (like a much better and more flexible build based on waf instead of distutils). I'm currently working on module support. Or, was ... I've put in a week this month, but then some simulation results grabbed my attention and I got derailed. Finishing up module support and making an Fwrap 0.2 release is #2 on my "stack" of things to work on, and once I get around to it I expect it to take about a week. So I think it will happen :-) If you (or anyone else) want to get involved and put in a day or two to help with polishing (command line interface, writing tests, documentation...) just email me. Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
