On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgoh...@uci.edu > <mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu>> wrote: > > > <snip> > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > <snip> > > ====================================================================== > FAIL: test_iterator.test_iter_broadcasting_errors > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "X:\Python26-x64\lib\site-packages\nose\case.py", line 187, in > runTest > self.test(*self.arg) > File > "X:\Python26-x64\lib\site-packages\numpy\core\tests\test_iterator.py", > line 639, in test_iter_broadcasting_errors > 'Message "%s" doesn\'t contain operand shape (2,3)' % msg) > File "X:\Python26-x64\lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.py", line > 34, in assert_ > raise AssertionError(msg) > AssertionError: Message "non-broadcastable output operand with shape > (%lld,%lld) > doesn't match the broadcast shape (%lld,%lld,%lld)" doesn't contain > operand shape (2,3) > > > I've pushed a fix for this to the 1.6.x branch, can you confirm that it > works on win-amd64? > > Thanks, > Mark > > <snip> >
Sorry, I forgot to mention that this test failed on 64-bit Python 2.6 only. I now recognize it is due to a known issue with Python's PyErr_Format function <http://bugs.python.org/issue7228>. Unfortunately the fix will not be backported to Python 2.6. Maybe this test could be marked as known failure on win-amd64-py2.6? Could you please revert your changes or set the format specifier to "%lld"? "%I64d" is not supported by PyErr_Format. Thanks, Christoph _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
