On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgoh...@uci.edu> wrote: >> >> >> On 5/3/2011 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release >>> candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. >>> >>> Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit >>> Windows + MSVC) and several memory leaks were fixed. If no new >>> problems are reported, the final release will be in one week. >>> >>> Sources and binaries can be found at >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.6.0rc2/ >>> For (preliminary) release notes see below. >>> >>> Enjoy, >>> Ralf >>> >> >> Looks good. The msvc9/MKL builds now pass all tests on win32 and >> win-amd64, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.1, and 3.2. > > Good, thanks for testing. >> >> One scipy test failure reported earlier remains, but that is probably no >> release blocker. >> <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-April/055877.html> > > That's a problem in scipy.stats, that only showed up recently because > of a bug fix in numpy.testing.
Sorry, I don't have 1.6 to test, but what are assertions like np.testing.assert_array_less(2, np.inf) np.testing.assert_array_less(np.array([ 0.911, 1.065, 1.325, 1.587]), np.inf) supposed to be with numpy 1.6 ? Josef > > Cheers, > Ralf > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion