Hi, On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > Yes, absolutely memory and speed are important. But a really fast > solution to the wrong problem isn't so useful either :-).
Would you be happy with me summarizing your idea as 1) = NA logic / API 2) = mask logic / API ? It might be possible to create (most of) an NA logic API from a mask implementation, and in fact, I think that's more or less what is being proposed. It's possible to imagine exposing an apparently separate API for mask operations, but which in fact uses the same implementation. Mark, Chuck - is that right? If we choose a mask implementation, that will have consequences for memory (predictable) and performance (unpredictable). Is that a good summary? See you, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
