On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Mark Wiebe <mwwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > typedef npy_uint8 npy_mask; > > #define NPY_MASK NPY_UINT8 > > #define NPY_MASK_ISEXPOSED(mask) (((mask)&0x01) != 0) > > #define NPY_MASK_GETPAYLOAD(mask) (((npy_mask)mask) >> 1) > > #define NPY_MASK_MAKEMASK(exposed, payload) ((npy_mask)(exposed&0x01) | > > (npy_mask)(payload << 1)) > > Even better, these should be inline functions instead of macros... (or > is there some horrible old compiler that we care about that that > wouldn't work for?) > That's a good idea, it's always worthwhile to use the little bit of type checking the C compiler will let you. NumPy has a macro NPY_INLINE which is used to define inline functions. -Mark > > -- Nathaniel > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
