yup, duplicate field names given. I didn't commit the non-working version and I didn't want to mess up my working code so I tried duplicating the dtype in a new file and couldn't recreate the error. I suppose the answer to my question is, there is no limit to the number of records? Must have been an invalid name, or a different error on my part. Out of curiosity, what does recarray consider an invalid field name?
On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Craig Yoshioka <crai...@me.com> wrote: >> duplicate column in dtype? >> > > "Duplicate field names given."? Can you post code to replicate? > >> I just consolidated some of the columns and the error went away... none had >> duplicate field names... hence the question. >> > > I don't think this would be raised unless there are duplicates. There > is some name changing for invalid field names that could result in a > name collision. I think I've run into this before. > > Skipper > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
