Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote:
> 25.10.2011 06:59, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
>> res = np.longdouble(2)**64
>> res-1
>> 36893488147419103231.0
>
> Can you check if long double works properly (not a given) in C on that
> platform:
>
> long double x;
> x = powl(2, 64);
> x -= 1;
> printf("%g %Lg\n", (double)x, x);
>
> or, in case the platform doesn't have powl:
>
> long double x;
> x = pow(2, 64);
> x -= 1;
> printf("%g %Lg\n", (double)x, x);
Both the same as numpy:
[mb312@jerry ~]$ gcc test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'powl'
[mb312@jerry ~]$ ./a.out
1.84467e+19 3.68935e+19
Thanks,
Matthew
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
