On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, Pierre Haessig <pierre.haes...@crans.org> wrote: > Le 04/02/2012 23:19, Ralf Gommers a écrit : > > scipy.signal is the right place I think. numpy shouldn't grow too many functions like this. > > [going back in time on the autocorrelation topic] > > I see scipy.signal being the good place. However, I have the (possibly wrong) feeling that Matplotlib is not so much depending on scipy. > Would Matplotlib's acorr/xcorr functions benefit from a faster function available in scipy as opposed to numpy ? > > Pierre >
Mpl does not depend on scipy at all and it is intended to stay that way. Mind you, mpl does not "require" acorr/xcorr because we do it using existing numpy tools. And any user needing a faster version can simply call it themselves and simply plot the results themselves. The current functions are merely convenience functions So, yes, it would be nice to have it in numpy, but if it fits better in scipy, then put it there. Ben Root
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
