On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Alan G Isaac <alan.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
> for the core developers. The right way to produce a > governance structure is to make concrete proposals and > show how these proposals are in the interest of the > *developers* (as well as of the users). > > At this point, it seems to me that Matthew is simply trying to make the case that ==some== governance structure should be (or should be more clearly) set up. Even this fairly modest goal seems to be receiving blowback from some. Perhaps a specific proposal would be more convincing to those in opposition, but I'd like to think that the merits for a governance structure could be appreciated without having specific the details of what such a structure would look like. Matthew's links certainly make a good case, IMO. He has also described a number of scenarios where a governance structure would be helpful (even if we think the likelihood of such scenarios is small).
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
