Hi, again (sorry), On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Christopher Jordan-Squire <cjord...@uw.edu> wrote: > On the broader topic of recruitment...sure, cython has a lower barrier > to entry than C++. But there are many, many more C++ developers and > resources out there than cython resources. And it likely will stay > that way for quite some time.
On the other hand, in the current development community around numpy, and among the subscribers to this mailing list, I suspect there is more Cython experience than C++ experience. Of course it might be that so-far undiscovered C++ developers are drawn to a C++ rewrite of Numpy. But it that really likely? I can see a C++ developer being drawn to C++ performance library they would use in their C++ applications, but it's harder for me to imagine a C++ programmer being drawn to a Python library because the internals are C++. Best, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
