Den 19.02.2012 10:52, skrev Mark Wiebe:

    C++ removes some of this advantage -- now there is extra code
    generated by
    the compiler to handle constructors, destructors, operators etc
    which can
    make a material difference to fast inner loops. So you end up just
    writing
    "C-style" anyway.


This is in fact not true, and writing in C++ style can often produce faster code. A classic example of this is C qsort vs C++ std::sort. You may be thinking of using virtual functions in a class hierarchy, where a tradeoff between performance and run-time polymorphism is being done. Emulating the functionality that virtual functions provide in C will give similar performance characteristics as the C++ language feature itself.

I agree with Mark here. C++ usually produces the faster code. C++ has abstractions that makes it easier to write more efficient code. C++ provides more and better information to the compiler (e.g. strict aliasing rules). C++ compilers are also getting insanely good at optimisation, usually better than C compilers. But C++ also makes it easy to write sluggish bloatware, so the effect on performance is not predictable.

Sturla

_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to