On 03/07/2012 11:15 AM, Pierre Haessig wrote: > Hi, > Le 07/03/2012 20:57, Eric Firing a écrit : >> In other words, good low-level support for numpy.ma functionality? > Coming back to *existing* ma support, I was just wondering whether it > was now possible to "np.save" a masked array. > (I'm using numpy 1.5)
No, not with the mask preserved. This is one of the improvements I am hoping for with the upcoming missing data work. Eric > In the end, this is the most annoying problem I have with the existing > ma module which otherwise is pretty useful to me. I'm happy not to need > to process 100% of my data though. > > Best, > Pierre > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
