On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Tim Cera <t...@cerazone.net> wrote: > >> I have been developing a set of pad functions to pad arrays in different >> ways. Really close to having it accepted into numpy, but I want to revisit >> an implementation issue that I have become worried about. Should these >> functions be collected into a 'pad' namespace or put raw into np.lib? >> >> Do I really care about this? Not really since it isn't a utility issue, >> but I contend that it would look better to pull these functions into their >> own namespace. >> >> +1 one for a separate 'pad' or 'padding' namespace. Adding 10 functions > to the main numpy namespace feels like too much. > > I think there is also a question of using a prefix pad_xxx for the function names as opposed to pad.xxx. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion