2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt <ste...@sun.ac.za> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus? > >> This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing. > > > > We seem to have a consensus regarding interest in the topic. > > For the benefit of those of us interested in both discussions, would > you kindly start a new thread on the MA topic? > > In response to Travis's suggestion of writing up a short summary of > community principles, as well as Matthew's initial formulation, I > agree that this would be helpful in enshrining the values we cherish > here, as well as in communicating those values to the next generation > of developers. > > I think we adhere to these pretty well already, the problem is with the word 'everyone'. I grew up in Massachusetts where town meetings were a tradition. At those meetings the townsfolk voted on the budget, zoning, construction of public buildings, use of public spaces and other such topics. A quorum of voters was needed to make the votes binding, and apart from that the meeting was limited to people who lived in the town, they, after all, paid the taxes and had to live with the decisions. Outsiders could sit in by invitation, but had to sit in a special area and were not expected to speak unless called upon and certainly couldn't vote. So that is one tradition, a democratic tradition with a history of success. We are a much smaller community, physically separated, and don't need that sort of exclusivity, but even so we have our version of resident and taxes, which consists of hanging out on the list and contributing work. I think everyone is welcome to express an opinion and make an argument, but not everyone has a veto. I think a veto is a privilege, not a right, and to have that privilege I think one needs to demonstrate an investment in the project, consisting in this case of code contributions, code review, and other such mundane tasks that demonstrate a larger interest and a willingness to work. Anyone can do this, it doesn't require permission or special dispensation, Numpy is very open in that regard. Folks working in related projects, such as ipython and pandas, are also going to be listened to because they have made that investment in time and work and the popularity of Numpy depends on keeping them happy. But a right to veto doesn't automatically extend to everyone who happens to have an interest in a topic.
Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
