On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Charles R Harris > >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Ralf Gommers > >> > <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris > >> >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi All, > >> >>> > >> >>> Numpy is approaching a time of transition. Ralf will be > concentrating > >> >>> his > >> >>> efforts on Scipy > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I'll write a separate post on that asap. > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> and I will be cutting back on my work on Numpy. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I sincerely hope you don't cut back on your work too much Charles. > You > >> >> have done an excellent job as "chief maintainer" over the last years. > >> >> > >> >>> The 1.7 release looks to be delayed and I suspect that the Continuum > >> >>> Analytics folks will become increasingly dedicated to the big data > >> >>> push. We > >> >>> need new people to carry things forward and I think Nathaniel can > pick > >> >>> up > >> >>> part of the load. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Assuming he wants them, I am definitely +1 on giving Nathaniel commit > >> >> rights. His recent patches and debugging of issues were of high > quality > >> >> and > >> >> very helpful. > >> >> > >> > > >> > OK, I went ahead and added him whether he wants it or not ;) > >> > >> Hah. Thanks! > >> > >> Is there a "committers guide" anywhere? By default I would assume that > >> the rules are pretty much -- continue sending pull requests for my own > >> changes (unless a trivial typo fix in a comment or something), go > >> ahead and merge anyone else's pull request where things seem okay and > >> my best judgement is we have consensus, fix things if my judgement was > >> wrong? But I don't want to step on any toes... > >> > > > > You can commit your own stuff also if someone signs off on it or it seems > > uncontroversial and has sat there for a while. It's mostly a judgement > call. > > Speaking of which, this pull request has been sitting for a bit, > waiting for your input :-) > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/280 > Mark and Travis made most of the comments so I figured it was up to them to sign off. If you think it is ready, go ahead and commit it, it's one of the reasons I gave you the premissions. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion