Hi, I think he was referring that making NUMPY_ARRAY_OBJECT[...] syntax support the operation that you said is hard. But having a separate function do it is less complicated as you said.
Fred On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:27 PM, John Salvatier <jsalv...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Can you clarify why it would be super hard? I just reused the code for > advanced indexing (a modification of PyArray_SetMap). Am I missing something > crucial? > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Travis Oliphant <tra...@continuum.io> > wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 26, 2012, at 11:46 AM, John Salvatier wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> If you increment an array using advanced indexing and have repeated >> indexes, the array doesn't get repeatedly >> incremented, http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/50291. >> I wrote a C function that does incrementing with repeated indexes correctly. >> The branch is here (https://github.com/jsalvatier/numpy see the last two >> commits). Would a patch with a cleaned up version of a function like this be >> accepted into numpy? I'm not experienced writing numpy C code so I'm sure it >> still needs improvement. >> >> >> This is great. It is an often-requested feature. It's *very difficult* >> to do without changing fundamentally what NumPy is. But, yes this would be >> a great pull request. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Travis >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion