Hi, On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:29 PM, John Hunter <jdh2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jim Vickroy <jim.vick...@noaa.gov> wrote: >> >> As a lurker and user, I too wish for a distinct numpy-users list. -- jv >> > > This thread is a perfect example of why another list is needed. It's > currently 42 semi-philosophical posts about what kind community numpy should > be and what kinds of lists or stacks should serve it. There needs to be a > place where people can ask simple 'how do I do x in numpy" questions without > having to wade through hundreds of posts about release cycles, community > input, process, and decisions about ABI and API compatibility in point > versus major releases.
Oh - dear. I think the point that most of us agreed on was that having a different from: address wasn't a perfect solution for giving people space for asking newbie type questions. No-one has to read an email. If it looks boring or silly or irrelevant to your concerns, well, then ignore it. > Most people just don't care -- they just want to be > reasonably sure that the developers do care and are doing it right. And if > they want to participate or observe these discussions, they know where to > go. It's like sausage making -- the more people get an inside look at how > the sausage is made, the more they are afraid to eat it. Not so in general. The more I hang out on the cython / sympy / ipython mailing lists, the more I feel like using and (if I can) contributing. > In mpl we have a devel list and a users list. Preparing for a release, we > might have a hundred emails about PR status and breakers and release cycles > and god knows what. The users list gets "rc1 is ready for testing", "rc2 is > ready for testing" and "v1.1.1 is released". That's about all most people > want to know about our release process. I can see an argument for numpy-announce. Best, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion