On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:18 PM, jay bourque <jay.bour...@continuum.io> wrote: > Just added PR #359. The purpose is to allow the nditer object operand and > iter flags to be set for a ufunc to provide better control over how an array > is iterated over by a ufunc and how the ufunc uses the operands passed to > it. One specific motivation for this is to be able to specify an input > operand to a ufunc as being read/write instead of read only.
Huh. My first gut reaction to this is that it's an argument *against* merging this change, because ufuncs *shouldn't* be writing to their inputs. Maybe I'm wrong, but... obviously there is more context here than we've heard so far. Can you explain what you're actually trying to accomplish? -n _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
