So when upgrading everything you prefer to keep the bugs in 2.6 that were 
squashed in 2.7? Who has taught IT managers that older and more buggy versions 
of software are more "professional" and better for corporate environments?

Sturla


Den 14. des. 2012 kl. 05:14 skrev Raul Cota <r...@virtualmaterials.com>:

> 
> +1 from me
> 
> For what is worth, we are just moving forward from Python 2.2 / Numeric 
> and are going to 2.6 and it has been rather painful because of the 
> several little details of extensions and other subtleties. I believe we 
> will settle there for a while. For companies like ours, it is a big 
> problem to upgrade versions. There is always this or that hiccup that 
> "works great" in a version but not so much in another and we also have 
> all sorts of extensions.
> 
> 
> 
> Raul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 13/12/2012 9:34 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> Time to raise this topic again. Opinions welcome.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to