On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Oscar Villellas > <oscar.villel...@continuum.io> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> At Continuum Analytics we've been working on a submodule implementing >> a set of lineal algebra operations as generalized ufuncs. This allows >> specifying arrays of lineal algebra problems to be computed with a >> single Python call, allowing broadcasting as well. As the >> vectorization is handled in the kernel, this gives a speed edge on the >> operations. We think this could be useful to the community and we want >> to share the work done. > > It certainly does look useful. My question is -- why do we need two > complete copies of the linear algebra routine interfaces? Can we just > replace the existing linalg functions with these new implementations? > Or if not, what prevents it?
The error reporting would have to be bodged back in. -- Robert Kern _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
