On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> I'm afraid I don't understand the discussion on timezones in > >>> datetime64, but I have the impression that those who do think it needs > >>> an urgent decision and some action for the short term. Is that right, > >>> datetimers? > >>> > >>> If that's so, and there are worthwhile changes that are practical in > >>> the next few weeks, it seems reasonable to wait. > > Well, it's only "urgent" in the sense that there are indeed a couple > small changes that would really help, and if we don't use a release to > motivate us, when will we it ever get done? > > But it'll still take someone to do it -- I'm afraid it's out of my > depth to do so. > > There is a chance that Mark W. or Travis O. could do it, but it does > seem unlikely that they'll find the time in the next week or two, so I > guess we'll put it off, and keep the "experimental" label on there. > > I think your best bet might be to cultivate Mark by testing and reviewing his current work in dynd ;) <snip> Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
