On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:47 AM,  <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> On 20 Aug 2013 12:09, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> > On 20 Aug 2013 01:39, "Joe Kington" <joferking...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ...<snip>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> However, my first interpretation of an axis argument in unique would
>>> >>> be that it treats each column (or whatever along axis) separately.
>>> >>> Analogously to max, argmax and similar.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Good point!
>>> >>
>>> >> That's certainly a potential source of confusion.  However, I can't
>>> >> seem
>>> >> to come up with a better name for the kwarg. Matlab's "unique" function
>>> >> has
>>> >> a "rows" option, which is probably a more intuitive name, but doesn't
>>> >> imply
>>> >> the expansion to N-dimensions.
>>> >>
>>> >> "axis" is still fairly idiomatic, despite the confusion over "unique
>>> >> rows/columns/etc" vs "unique items within each row/column/etc".
>>> >>
>>> >> Any thoughts on a better name for the argument?
>>> >
>>> > I also found this pretty confusing when first looking at the PR.
>>> >
>>> > One option might be to invert the sense of the argument to emphasize
>>> > that
>>> > it's treating subarrays as units, so instead of specifying the iteration
>>> > axis you specify the axes of the subarray. compare_axis= or something?
>>>
>>> you would need compare_axes (plural for ndim>2) and have to specify
>>> all but one axis, AFAICS.
>>
>> Well, it makes sense to specify any arbitrary subset of axes, whether or not
>> that's currently implemented.
>
> not AFAICS, if you want to return a rectangular array without
> nans/missing values.

and unless you want to ravel() the remaining axis, which is also weird
(I think).

Josef

>
> Josef
>
>>
>> -n
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to