Hi, How I can do this: int(scipy.comb(20314,117)) ... OverflowError: cannot convert float infinity to integer
abs, Koblitz 2013/8/20 <[email protected]> > Send NumPy-Discussion mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NumPy-Discussion digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. OS X binaries for releases (Ralf Gommers) > 2. Re: OS X binaries for releases (David Cournapeau) > 3. Re: OS X binaries for releases (KACVINSKY Tom) > 4. Re: OS X binaries for releases (David Cournapeau) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:48:51 +0200 > From: Ralf Gommers <[email protected]> > Subject: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > < > cabl7cqjacxp2grtt8hvmayajrm0xmtn1qt71wkdnbgq7dlu...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi all, > > Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and > time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we still > provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do this > anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC, just > that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6 > came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the > download stats at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/confirm this). > > Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of 2.6 > OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 for a long > time - support it but no binaries. > > So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit universal > binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS X binaries. > We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have access to a > hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a release > (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 SDK on 10.8 > and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful. > > Any concerns, objections? > > Cheers, > Ralf > > P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/4d74e9d0/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:17:19 +0100 > From: David Cournapeau <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <CAGY4rcXt+= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and > > time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we still > > provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do this > > anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC, > just > > that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6 > > came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the > > download stats at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/confirm this). > > > > Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of > > 2.6 OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 for > a > > long time - support it but no binaries. > > > > So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit universal > > binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS X binaries. > > We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have access to a > > hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a release > > (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 SDK on > 10.8 > > and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful. > > > > I am not sure one can use 10.6 SDK on 10.8 ? I am actually looking into > those issues for our mac support at Enthought > > Are you here for euroscipy ? > > David > > > > > Any concerns, objections? > > > > Cheers, > > Ralf > > > > P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/b3b69f9c/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:20:21 +0000 > From: KACVINSKY Tom <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > You can use the 10.6 SDK on 10.8. At least we do. > > Tom > > On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:17, "David Cournapeau" <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi all, > > Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and > time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we still > provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do this > anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC, just > that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6 > came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the > download stats at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/confirm this). > > Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of > 2.6 OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 for a > long time - support it but no binaries. > > So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit universal > binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS X binaries. > We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have access to a > hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a release > (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 SDK on 10.8 > and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful. > > I am not sure one can use 10.6 SDK on 10.8 ? I am actually looking into > those issues for our mac support at Enthought > > Are you here for euroscipy ? > > David > > Any concerns, objections? > > Cheers, > Ralf > > P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy > > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or > privileged. > > If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in > error, > > (i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it, > > (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this > email and all attachments, > > (iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or > responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email. > > For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/baca79c9/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:31:11 +0100 > From: David Cournapeau <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <CAGY4rcUR=cty1asAp1fwhAY6hStbiEU_R+DZs86nJ= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:20 PM, KACVINSKY Tom <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > You can use the 10.6 SDK on 10.8. At least we do. > > > > With which compiler ? > > David > > > > > Tom > > > > On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:17, "David Cournapeau" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and > >> time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we > still > >> provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do > this > >> anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC, > just > >> that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6 > >> came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the > >> download stats at > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/ confirm this). > >> > >> Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of > >> 2.6 OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 > for a > >> long time - support it but no binaries. > >> > >> So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit > >> universal binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS > X > >> binaries. We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have > >> access to a hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a > >> release (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 > SDK > >> on 10.8 and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful. > >> > > > > I am not sure one can use 10.6 SDK on 10.8 ? I am actually looking into > > those issues for our mac support at Enthought > > > > Are you here for euroscipy ? > > > > David > > > >> > >> Any concerns, objections? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Ralf > >> > >> P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the > > individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential > and/or > > privileged. > > > > If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in > > error, > > > > (i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it, > > > > (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this > > email and all attachments, > > > > (iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or > > responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email. > > > > For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/e939bfa6/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > End of NumPy-Discussion Digest, Vol 83, Issue 33 > ************************************************ >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
