On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Russell E. Owen <ro...@uw.edu> wrote:
> In article > <cabl7cqg5vv_vnp0hbdx+ys6gt0npwqehth3mwb6j65ow9+1...@mail.gmail.com>, > Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris > > > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Numpy 1.8 is about ready for an rc1, which brings up the question of > > > which > > > > binary builds so put up on sourceforge. For Windows maybe > > > >... > > > > OS X 10.6 python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with native compiler, > > > linked > > > > with Accelerate. > > > > OS X 10.7 python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with native compiler, > > > linked > > > > with Accelerate. > > > > OS X 10.8 python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with native compiler, > > > linked > > > > with Accelerate. > > > > > > > > That seems like a lot. It is fairly easy to compile from source on > the > > > mac > > > > these days, are all those binary packages really needed? > > > > > > > That's not exactly the right list - the same installers built on 10.6 > also > > work on 10.7 and 10.8. > > I agree. I'll chime in and give my recommendations, though Ralf is the > expert: > David is our resident build/distribute guru actually. > For MacOS X I suggest building binary installers for python.org's python > 2.7, 3.2 and 3.3 (the 64-bit versions). The result will run on 10.6 and > later. It is safest to build these on MacOS X 10.6; it may work to build > on a later MacOS X, but it sure doesn't for some packages. > Agreed. I think we discussed before not providing OS X 10.5 and python 2.6 binaries, that would make sense imho. > > You will have to update to the latest bdist_mpkg to build Mac binary > installers for python 3. I've not tried it yet. > I just tried, it's now possible to build 3.x binaries with a simple ``paver dmg -p 3.3``. > > I don't think users expect a binary installer for Apple's python; I > don't recall ever seeing these for numpy, scipy, matplotlib.... But if > you do want to supply one, We don't I think. Just python.org, keeps it simple. Cheers, Ralf > Apple provides Python 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7 but no > 3.x (at least in MacOS X 10.8). > > -- Russell > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
