On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think that behavior is acceptable.
That's... too bad? I'm not sure what your objection actually is. It's an intentional change (though disabled by default in 1.8), and a necessary step to rationalizing our definition of contiguity and stride handling in general, which has a number of benefits: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/release.html#npy-relaxed-strides-checking http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/arrays.ndarray.html#internal-memory-layout-of-an-ndarray Why do you care about the stride of an array with only 1 element, where by definition you never use the stride? -- Nathaniel J. Smith Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh http://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion