Did you consider to check the experimental binaries on https://code.google.com/p/mingw-w64-static/ for Python-2.7? These binaries has been build with with a customized mingw-w64 toolchain. These builds are fully statically build and are link against the MSVC90 runtime libraries (gcc runtime is linked statically) and OpenBLAS.
Carl 2014-01-26 Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> > 26.01.2014 14:44, Dinesh Vadhia kirjoitti: > > This conversation gets discussed often with Numpy developers but > > since the requirement for optimized Blas is pretty common these > > days, how about distributing Numpy with OpenBlas by default? People > > who don't want optimized BLAS or OpenBLAS can then edit the > > site.cfg file to add/remove. I can never remember if Numpy comes > > with Atlas by default but either way, if using MKL is not feasible > > because of its licensing issues then Numpy has to be re-compiled > > with OpenBLAS (for example). Why not make it easier for developers > > to use Numpy with an in-built optimized Blas. > > The Numpy Windows binaries distributed in the numpy project at > sourceforge.net are compiled with ATLAS, which should count as an > optimized BLAS. I don't recall what's the situation with OSX binaries, > but I'd believe they're with Atlas too. > > If you are suggesting bundling OpenBLAS with Numpy source releases --- > arguments against: > > OpenBLAS is big, and still rapidly moving. Moreover, bundling it with > Numpy does not really make it any easier to build. > > -- > Pauli Virtanen > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion