On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > Robert Kern <robert.kern <at> gmail.com> writes: > [clip] >> Seems like more trouble than it's worth to automate. We don't want >> just anyone with a Github account to add arbitrary code to our test >> suites, do we? The idea of an "expected failure" test suite is a good >> one, but it seems to me that it could be maintained by normal PR >> processes just fine. > > Yes. However, using a separate repository might make this more > easy to deal with. This also does not have the "running arbitrary > code" problem.
Yes, I agree with keeping it in a separate repo. Just add to it via the normal PR processes. -- Robert Kern _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
