On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:42 AM, faisal anees < mohammedfaisal.an...@students.iiit.ac.in> wrote:
> I am Mohammed Faisal Anees , a Computer Science student at IIIT- > Hyderabad. I was going though the ideas page and I found "Improve Numpy > datetime functionality" really interesting , > It's great to have the interest! One trick is that I dont hink there is a consensus on what needs to be done to "improve datetime". One thing that does need to be done is cleaning up time zone handling -- and I think we ALMOST have consensus on how to do that (at least the quick fix part). Take a look for threads on this list in the last year about "datetime64" and this ticket: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/3388 (and search for other datetime64 tickets...) Note that we are hoping to fix that for 1.9 -- anyone have a time scale for that? Too soon for GSoC? -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception chris.bar...@noaa.gov
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
