On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Leo Mao <lmao20...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Aron, > > Previously mentioned by Julian, Yeppp may be a good candidate. > As for selecting a good library, I will consider the performance and the > API of the library. > The integration of the library should improve the performance of numpy and > also not make the source too complicated to maintain. > And I think the library should be mature so that the API will not be > changed significantly. > > Please point out if there is something I miss. > Also I will be grateful to any suggestions for my proposal. > > Regards, > Leo Mao > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Aron Ahmadia <a...@ahmadia.net> wrote: > >> Hi Leo, >> >> Out of curiosity, which vector math libraries did you have in mind as >> likely candidates for inclusion? How are you planning on selecting the >> library to integrate? >> >> Cheers, >> Aron >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Leo Mao <lmao20...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> The attachment is my draft of proposal. The project is "vector math >>> library integration". >>> I think I need some feedback to make it solider. >>> Any comment will be appreciated. >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Leo Mao >>> >>> The proposal as it stands is too open ended and lacking in specifics. Probably you should select a library before the start of GSOC, or at least have a list of candidates, and also narrow the part of numpy you want to improve to something definite: linalg, special functions, etc. That doesn't mean you can't do more if time allows ;) An estimate of expected gains over current code would also help. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
