This is great news. Excellent work Nathaniel and all others! Frédéric
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Aron Ahmadia <a...@ahmadia.net> wrote: > That's the best news I've had all week. > > Thanks for all your work on this Nathan. > > -A > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> Well, that was fast. Guido says he'll accept the addition of '@' as an >> infix operator for matrix multiplication, once some details are ironed >> out: >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027109.html >> http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0465/ >> >> Specifically, we need to figure out whether we want to make an >> argument for a matrix power operator ("@@"), and what >> precedence/associativity we want '@' to have. I'll post two separate >> threads to get feedback on those in an organized way -- this is just a >> heads-up. >> >> -n >> >> -- >> Nathaniel J. Smith >> Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh >> http://vorpus.org >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion