Yes, they seem to be focused on HPC clusters with sometimes old rules (as no shared library). Also, they don't use a potable Makefile generator, not even autoconf, this may also play a role in Windows support.
2014-05-12 12:52 GMT+01:00 Olivier Grisel <olivier.gri...@ensta.org>: > BLIS looks interesting. Besides threading and runtime configuration, > adding support for building it as a shared library would also be > required to be usable by python packages that have several extension > modules that link against a BLAS implementation. > > https://code.google.com/p/blis/wiki/FAQ#Can_I_build_BLIS_as_a_shared_library? > > """ > Can I build BLIS as a shared library? > > The BLIS build system is not yet capable of outputting a shared > library. Building and using shared libraries requires careful > attention to various linkage and runtime details that, quite frankly, > the BLIS developers would rather avoid if possible. If this feature is > important to you, please speak up on the blis-devel mailing list. > """ > > Also Windows support is still considered experimental according to the same > FAQ. > > -- > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher Music band: http://liliejay.com/ _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
