On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:19 PM, cjw <c...@ncf.ca> wrote: > Charles, > > Nothing I've seen so far envisages disturbing the existing, in my opinion > flawed, Matrix Class. > > I trust that I have not missed anything. > > Compilation is a complex press for a person unfamiliar with the C. > Anything you could do to simplify that would be welcome. > > We aren't talking about the matrix class, but rather the new '@' operator to be used with arrays. The implementation of that operator could depend on routines defined in other modules, as does the current dot method, or we can move the overall implementation down into the multiarray module. The question of using blas_lite come up because some things would be a bit simpler is we didn't need to make the code depend on whether or not there was a cblas library.
<snip> Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
