Hi Derek, > But you are right that the problem with using the first_values, which should > of course be valid, > somehow stems from the use of usecols, it seems that in that loop > > for (i, conv) in user_converters.items(): > > i in user_converters and in usecols get out of sync. This certainly looks > like a bug, the entire way of > modifying i inside the loop appears a bit dangerous to me. I’ll have look if > I can make this safer. Thanks. > > As long as your data don’t actually contain any missing values you might also > simply use np.loadtxt. Ok, wasn't aware of that function so far. I will try that!
Best wishes Adrian _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion