Hi Derek,

> But you are right that the problem with using the first_values, which should 
> of course be valid,
> somehow stems from the use of usecols, it seems that in that loop
> 
>     for (i, conv) in user_converters.items():
> 
> i in user_converters and in usecols get out of sync. This certainly looks 
> like a bug, the entire way of
> modifying i inside the loop appears a bit dangerous to me. I’ll have look if 
> I can make this safer.
Thanks.
> 
> As long as your data don’t actually contain any missing values you might also 
> simply use np.loadtxt.
Ok, wasn't aware of that function so far. I will try that!

Best wishes
Adrian
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to