Glen Mabey <gma...@swri.org> wrote:
> I'd really like for this to be included alongside numpy.i -- but maybe I
> overestimate the number of numpy users who use complex data (let your
> voice be heard!) and who also end up using std::complex in C++ land.
I don't think you do. But perhaps you overestimate the number of NumPy
users who use Swig?
Cython seems to be the preferred wrapping tool today, and it understands
complex numbers:
cdef double complex J = 0.0 + 1j
If you tell Cython to emit C++, this will result in code that uses
std::complex<double>.
Sturla
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
